From 76a1c10d99e16d87bc7c3f17cbc764986921c07f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Hutchings Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 01:37:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fanotify: Taint on use of FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS Forwarded: not-needed Various free and proprietary AV products use this feature and users apparently want it. But punting access checks to userland seems like an easy way to deadlock the system, and there will be nothing we can do about that. So warn and taint the kernel if this feature is actually used. Gbp-Pq: Topic debian Gbp-Pq: Name fanotify-taint-on-use-of-fanotify_access_permissions.patch --- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c index 4d765c72496..ed4f90e0a1f 100644 --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c @@ -1732,6 +1732,14 @@ static int do_fanotify_mark(int fanotify_fd, unsigned int flags, __u64 mask, umask = FANOTIFY_EVENT_FLAGS; } +#ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS + if (mask & FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS) { + pr_warn_once("%s (%d): Using fanotify permission checks may lead to deadlock; tainting kernel\n", + current->comm, current->pid); + add_taint(TAINT_AUX, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); + } +#endif + f = fdget(fanotify_fd); if (unlikely(!f.file)) return -EBADF; -- 2.30.2